Discussion:
[avr-libc-dev] [patch #8966] Update RFR devices header files
Pitchumani
2016-04-04 09:01:35 UTC
Permalink
URL:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?8966>

Summary: Update RFR devices header files
Project: AVR C Runtime Library
Submitted by: pitchumani
Submitted on: Mon 04 Apr 2016 09:01:33 AM GMT
Category: None
Priority: 5 - Normal
Status: Works For Me
Privacy: Public
Assigned to: pitchumani
Originator Email:
Open/Closed: Open
Discussion Lock: Any

_______________________________________________________

Details:

RFR devices (mega64/644/128/1284/256/2564rfr2) headers are included in the
revision 2308.
http://svn.savannah.nongnu.org/viewvc?view=rev&root=avr-libc&revision=2308

It seems they are in struct-based format like xmega headers. Usually tiny and
mega headers are in non struct-based format. Atmel published headers for these
RFR devices are updated. This patch updates the RFR devices header as per
latest headers from Atmel.

Posted the patch in the mailing list:
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/avr-libc-dev/2016-03/msg00005.html



_______________________________________________________

File Attachments:


-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon 04 Apr 2016 09:01:34 AM GMT Name: rfr-device-headers.patch Size:
2MB By: pitchumani

<http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/download.php?file_id=36830>

_______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

<http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?8966>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.nongnu.org/
Joerg Wunsch
2017-06-11 20:57:44 UTC
Permalink
Follow-up Comment #1, patch #8966 (project avr-libc):

As already discussed in the mailing list, applying this patch
would essentially remove a lot of existing functionality from
the header files (it removes about 20000 lines in total), just
for the sake of "we've always been doing it that way", without
any further benefit for the users.

Therefore, I wouldn't want to apply it.

If there are any actual bugs to be fixed, they'd better be
fixed without removing unrelated pieces of code.

_______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

<http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?8966>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.nongnu.org/

Loading...